The Verdict · 4-lens call
On pace, we were a slow car in a fast class — not a B car robbed of glory.
Our best lap (2:24.0) ranks 17th of 28 in Class A, ~10s off the A median — but it would sit near the back of B (~31/36) and looks mid-pack in C (~10/18). The honest fair-classing case is about car spec & value, not lap time. Where the story turns in our favor: attrition — our 277-lap survival would have finished far better in B/C than pace alone suggests.
Outright pace · argues C/low-B
Race pace · compute
Attrition · favorable
Competitiveness gap · +10s/lap
Class Placement
Where our pace lands in each class
Sweep left↔right across a class — hover to read the pace under your cursor. Left = faster.
2:102:162:222:282:332:392:45
◀ fasterlap timeslower ▶
Sweep across a class — the tooltip reads the pace under your cursor: how many cars hit that pace, how many are faster, and our gap. Hill height = how many cars cluster at that lap time; dashed line = our best.
Counterfactual Finish
If our 277 laps were entered elsewhere
Two lenses — they disagree, and the disagreement is the insight.
Pace lens
Class AP24
Class BP31 / 36
Class CP10 / 18
Attrition lens
Class AP17
Class BP21 / 36
Class CP5 / 18
Reading This View
How to interpret the placement data
Pace lens
Where our best lap ranks in each class's field
Attrition lens
Where our 277-lap finish places against each class's actual finishers
The gap
~10s/lap to the A median — car spec & value question, not just driving